watcher wrote:
garybrevans wrote:
... the judge told her to use 'Indecent photographs of children' because that is what the legislation defines it as. ...
Does that rather narrow definition create a problem handling computer generated images that are not technically photographs?
In the UK we also have the separate legal concept of ‘prohibited’ images of children, so no it doesn’t create problems.
Separate images, separate offences; and therefore separate (i.e. more) charges.
↧