sgreene2991 wrote:
The best thing to do is find a file type that can be karge enough to store your files, but can also avoid detection. I have seen people use video file extensions to hide their containers in, and these can go undetected fairly well.
But - on the other hand - detecting that it is not a "real" video file is as difficult as double clicking on it and see that it doesn't play <img src="images/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif" alt="Rolling Eyes" title="Rolling Eyes" /> , and - in the case of an investigation, depending on the kind of offence you are charged with or suspected of, pictures and video files tend to be #1 and #2 on the list of "files to be examined".
sgreene2991 wrote:
Its when you have a 10gb txt file that peoiple start to get a little suspicious.
Yep. <img src="images/smiles/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" />
sgreene2991 wrote:
If you want plausible deniability good luck. In my experiences with law enforcement there is no such thing.
As a matter of fact there isn't even with non-LE (as a matter of fact usually LE are prevented by the Law to use the US$ 5 wrench trick):
http://www.forensicfocus.com/Forums/viewtopic/p=6567817/highlight=plausible/#6567817
whilst non-LE may use it....
@DanielDavis
If you sum to the "plausible deniability" the good ol' concept of needles and haystacks, it comes out as obvious that the smaller is the "hidden" data the easier is to conceal it....
Maybe the question you had in mind is more like "how big can i make the "hidden" data container and reasonably hope that noone will notice at first sight?"
jaclaz
↧