jhup wrote:
Yes - and this is a perfect example how something that is of little value will be proofed in the flames of courts.Sure <img src="images/smiles/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /> .
But I wanted to highlight the fallacy of the reasoning.
The preamble is that the certification is needed because there is a high demand of digital forensics qualified personnel.
Imagine that (as it happened at the beginning of WWII) the UK was in high demand of aircraft pilots and of fighter aircrafts.
At the time the "solution to the high demand of fighter aircrafts" was to start producing more planes.
The "solution to the high demand of RAF pilots" was to make "crash courses" to make in no time good willing kids become "good enough" in piloting Spitfires, Hurricanes (and what not) to be sent against a highly trained, highly technological military aviation corp like Luftwaffe was at the time. (and it worked)
Now imagine that the same problem was tackled today.
There would be three different certifications needed, the volunteers would need to have a degree in engineering (or mathematics and physics), at least 1000 hors of flight experience on small civil aircrafts, and since the number of such candidates would be trifling, the war would be lost.
When there is demand of something/somebody youproduce more of what is needed, and you do that quickly, you don't add qualifications to the minimum requisites, and such qualifications that it will take 6 or 7 years to get.
jaclaz
↧