dan0841 wrote:
I can't see a link to the list of names.
But if you mean in the original validation document there are a list of participants on page 102 of the document which was posted by the OP. They appear to relate to the appendix authors.
Thanks dan0841. I did see those names but they aren't attributed to each specific content. It is not clear whether any of the panel used their own company details or used details from others.
Additionally, the content itself is unattributed to foundation stone principles. For instance
mark_adp wrote:
As far as I can tell, this 'guidance and advice' follows very closely inline with ISO 17025 requirements on validation and testing of tools and procedures? "As far as I can tell" - guessing shouldn't be necessary in a government document but actually known that the scope of a particular statement is anchored to a particular principle/clause.
The above are observations only and in fairness, the dictionary term "draft document" is referred to 'as a work in progress'.
↧
